Complex Optics Network Logo
Nebraska SkyUNL Logo
Home Contact Research Publications Press releases Search
People
Research
Publications
Teaching
Internal
Links
News
   Home > Research
Research
  Polaritons  |   MO-Hall-effect  |   Exchange-Polarization  |   Advanced Semiconductors  |   Nanocomposites  
  Solar cells  |   Conductive organics  |   In situ monitoring  |   Low-symmetry materials  

Magnetooptical Hall effect

State of the art

The free-carrier-properties effective mass m*, mobility m, and carrier concentration N are of fundamental importance for understanding basic material properties of semiconductors. N, m*, and m intriguingly combine concepts of classical (such as the effective "inertial" carrier mass) and quantum physics (e.g., the energy-momentum-dispersion and band occupation). A long term goal has been the accurate and simultaneous measurement of N, m, and m* by non-contact optical means in materials which are part of complex layered systems, such as semiconductor heterostructures.

Commonly, the electrical Hall-effect is measured to access N and m, which requires ohmic contacts. Such measurements are difficult if the material of interest is part of a complex layer structure, eventually buried by other highly-resistive or differently-conductive layers. The correct interpretation of the electrical measurement requires furthermore exact knowledge of the contact geometry, because Schottky barrier formation or space charge accumulation potentially affect the results.

According to the Drude model, the dielectric function e provides access to the square of the free-carrier (unscreened) plasma frequency wp and plasma resonance broadening gp. Under simplified assumptions about the free-carrier momentum distribution function - a single-species-carrier-plasma taken as example - wp and gp translate into the coupled quantities N/m* and m*m. No distinction can be made between N, m*, and m from measurement of e alone, nor can the sign of q be determined because wp is proportional to |q|. However, when brought into a magnetic field, the Lorentz force renders e a complex tensor, and provides the additional information required to obtain m* and sign(q). For semiconductor materials, this can be done by measurement of the magnetic-field-induced free-carrier birefringence. This approach is also applicable to organic conducting materials.

Click and enlarge! Fig. 0.

 

Generalized Ellipsometry

Standard (isotropic) ellipsometry determines two independent parameters, which provide the dielectric function e avoiding the Kramers-Kronig extension of pure intensity spectra in order to access both real and imaginary parts of e . Generalized ellipsometry extends to arbitrarily anisotropic materials, and allows for determination of the complete e tensor. Six parameters, which consist of the elements of the Jones reflection matrix, can be measured. The Jones matrix depends on the sample structure, each sample constituent's e, the ambient index of refraction, and the angle of incidence Fa. Treatment of anisotropic media is alternatively done within the Mueller-matrix- and Stokes-vector-approach. The elements of e follow by comparing calculated data to measured data upon standard least-square fit procedures. In addition to the ellipsometric parameters their standard deviations are determined, and propagated into the uncertainties (standard error) of the resulting fit parameters.

Far-infrared magneto-optic (MO) ellipsometer

Our setup uses a superconducting magnetocryostat (Oxford) with optical access ports and temperature-controlled (4K - RT) sample holder (Fig. 1. Click and enlarge! Fig. 1.
The magnetocryostat is kindly provided by Professor Dr. Pablo Esquinazi.) The magnetic field is parallel to the incident beam direction, and the angle of incidence is 45°. The strength of the field can be varied between B = -6T ... 6T. The beam is guided through exterior and interior windows, made from diamond and polyethylene. A third set of windows allows for transmission-type measurements. Details of a previous setup are given in M. Schubert, T. Hofmann, C. M. Herzinger, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 347 - 356 (2003).

next >

back to Research